The
Volvo Commercial
Smaller
Tornadoes
Photographing
the Clear Center
Fire
Whirls and Vortices, Liquid Fuels
Larger
Fire Vortices (40 ft plus)
Research
Opportunities
Links
and other information resources
Planet
Storm Video

The
Volvo Commercial
This was our first
really big artificial tornado. Tony Kaye directed the commercial,
which won a pile of awards (Cannes, Clios, etc.). Tony believes
in doing things for real: They hired a real tornado chaser, Gene
Rhoden (email:grhoden@why.net,
to play the chaser in the commercial.
We actually did all
the special effects (including falling boats, trees, and immense
amounts of blowing sand, debris, etc.) in the spot, which aired
in the U.K. in the summer of 1995. Hundreds of horsepower driving
a modified helicopter rotor produced the updraft, and more hundreds
of horsepower created a rotating airflow to feed the vortex. We
went from "green light" on the project to having the
rig up and running in our parking lot in about 3 weeks for testing,
then dismantled it and moved it to the desert for the shoot, which
lasted a week.
Our real problem
was that because it operated outdoors, we were subject to ambient
winds. March in California is probably the windiest month, and
our machine wouldn't operate in winds much over 5-7 mph. When
we were setting up, we had thunderstorms (making working on a
50 foot tower all the more fun), 50 mph winds and driving rain.
However, we did get some relatively calm windows of several hours
each to run the machine and generate some truly amazing footage.
We measured wind
speeds in excess of 70 mph at the core, which was about a foot
in diameter. It easily picked up run of the mill debris, like
straw, cloth, paper, and dust. It also could pick up and fling
heavier things, like 2x2 foot pieces of 3/4" plywood (ask
Steve Triplett, who got hit by one while we were testing). Tony
wanted a dark and menacing effect for the tornado, so we used
coal dust to produce a black debris cloud. We added fuller's earth
to the coal to reduce the explosion hazard. The black dust cloud
from the top of the rig extended several thousand feet into the
air, and was visible 10 miles away.
If you are a storm
chaser and you run across Gene, you might ask how he uses the
telescope at the Griffith Observatory in his work.
A fact
sheet we produced on the tornado for inquiring minds.
A photo
of the rig in operation. That is a full size Volvo 850 next to
the debris cloud.
An article
that appeared in a newspaper in England that summer with an interview
with two guys from the ad agency that was responsible for the
spot.
Coming Soon: a video
clip of the spot.
Photographic
Applications
Several TV commercials
and programs have photographed our 10 foot tornado as a visual
element which was later composited into another image. An episode
of Picket Fences used this kind of image to create a fairly realistic
looking tornado off in the distance which had realistic movement
dynamics. Since the vortex dynamics and appearance are controlled
by the same aerodynamics as a real tornado, the appearance is
quite realistic. In the Picket Fences episode, they talk about
the tornado as an F4, when in actuality, from movement and scale,
it looks more like an F2.
Coming soon: A single
frame from the video
The actual 10 foot
tornado appeared as Urkel's Science Project in an episode of Family
Matters that aired Twister opening week in May 1996. We set up
the machinery on stage and fired it up on cue. This is a pretty
neat effect, because you see the vortex core organize and form
a nice ropy looking vortex. The live audience thought it was pretty
cool, as well.
Coming soon: A single
frame from the video.
The 10 footer, visualized
with Liquid Nitrogen fog, was used as a novel projection screen
for a Miller beer commercial. The fog forms a very even, distinct
wall around the core with the appropriate flow parameters.
If the vortex generator
is properly set up, smoke injected outside the core remains there,
with a clear core remaining. A camera can be placed within the
core producing an interesting image of a hollow tube of smoke.
Obviously, the camera needs to be of an appropriate size and shape
to not perturb the flow excessively. The same phenomenon occurs
with burning fuel, producing a hollow luminous tube of fire, which
is visually quite impressive and surreal. For this case, the camera
needs to be heat resistant, or sacrificable. (We view this as
an appropriate sacrifice to the tornado gods).
There is a nice sequence
down the center of the fire vortex in the Entertainment Tonight
segment that aired xxxx.
Many people have
discovered (some accidentally) that running a vortex over a pool
of liquid fuel can produce an extremely intense vortex phenomenon.
The high air speed over the surface of the liquid, along with
the high shear, causes the liquid to be atomized quite effectively.
The atomized particles then burn quite vigorously and impressively.
In a sufficiently large size, the heated air created from the
combustion is sufficient to drive the vortex.
The trick is in finding
fuels that have a high enough flame speed to not blow out in the
high wind speeds encountered. For instance, kerosene is not nearly
flammable enough. We have had the best luck with things like petroleum
ether (a mix of pentane and hexane), dimethyl ether (which has
some handling problems), and blends of methanol and nitromethane.
You can, of course, use a fuel with high hydrogen/carbon ratio
(like ether) and mix inorganic ions like strontium or barium in
to produce colored fire whirls. The usual hydrocarbons burn with
a very luminous sooty flame which obscures the color from the
ions.
A photo
of petroleum ether in a 10 foot tall, 1 foot diameter vortex.
Note the hollow appearance, due to a strong downflow of clear
air in the center of the vortex . This particular vortex burned
about 100 cc of the pentane/hexane mix in about 30 seconds.
Some
experiments with larger fire vortices
We decided to experiment
with thermally driven vortices with the classic fire whirl (just
to get our feet wet, so to speak). We set up a rotating air flow
around a 4x8 foot aluminum tray about 2 inches deep. We then put
several gallons of gasoline into the tray and lit it on fire remotely
(Did you think some brave soul was going to run in there and do
it by flicking a Bic?) This produced a very spectacular whirling
column of intense fire about 40 feet tall and 3-4 feet in diameter.
Our experiments were terminated when the aluminum pan melted and
burned.
Sorry, we don't have
any pictures of these experiments, but next time the weather is
suitable, we'll try it again using a better fluid pan. We'll also
remember to turn on the video camera the next time, too.
We haven't had much
chance to do good quantitative research with these vortices. However,
if someone is interested, we do have some Research
Opportunities in which you would be interested.
Other
Tornado Web Sites and Resources of Interest
You have to go see
the Tornado Project at http://www.tornadoproject.com.
They put out a set of the best collection of tornado videos around,
named (oddly enough): Tornado Video Classics Vol I, II, and III.
The classic
Scientific American column "The Amateur Scientist" featured
some vortex apparatus and fire whirls in 1963. You might find
more at http://www.sciam.com
Laboratory Simulations
of Tornadoes, Robert P. Davies-Jones, in Proceedings of
the Symposium on Tornadoes: Assessment of Knowledge and Impolications
of Man, pp. 151-173, American Meteorological Society, Boston,
Mass. 1976.
Laboratory Models
of Tornadoes, Christopher R. Church and John
T. Snow, in The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction,
and Hazards. Geophysical Monograph 79, American Geophysical
Union, 1993.
The American
Meteorological Society is, of course, a resource for issues
about weather in general, and severe local storms in particular.